From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7501 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2002 18:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7487 invoked by uid 71); 3 Apr 2002 18:36:00 -0000 Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 10:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020403183600.7486.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: optimization/5040: g++-3.0.2: -O causes variables from different stack frames to overlap Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00239.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/5040; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: Jeremy Barnes Cc: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/5040: g++-3.0.2: -O causes variables from different stack frames to overlap Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 10:32:19 -0800 On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:22:59AM -0500, Jeremy Barnes wrote: > I don't have the time currently to bootstrap a CVS version of 3.1. I do have > some code (the relevent parts of our app distilled into a single source file) > that still reproduces the problem under 3.0.3. I can send it to an > individual developer, but would prefer not to send it to a public mailing > list. Respond if you are interested. I'd like to look at it. > My suspicion is that it won't show up in 3.1 using this source file, as the > example is extremely brittle. If this is the case, then the only way to be > sure it is fixed and not hiding, would be to diagnose it back on the 3.0.2 > branch, figure out where the problem was, and then look to see if it was > fixed in 3.1. Sounds arduous... Hmm, yes... r~