From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15848 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2002 10:35:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15824 invoked by uid 61); 4 Apr 2002 10:35:27 -0000 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 02:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020404103527.15823.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jeroenk@allieddata.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jeroenk@allieddata.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/6170: Unsigned division bug in gcc 3.x X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00305.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Unsigned division bug in gcc 3.x State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 4 02:35:25 2002 State-Changed-Why: (1) You did not provide the target tuple. I'm presuming i686-linux, since that's what most people who forget that linux runs on stuff besides x86 mean. (2) You did not provide the compiler options to use in reproducing your bug. I tried -O0, -O1, and -O2. And I can't reproduce this with 3.1 20020326, so I presume its fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6170