From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25582 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2002 23:24:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25561 invoked by uid 61); 4 Apr 2002 23:24:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:24:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020404232456.25558.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: Andreas.Krakowczyk@fujitsu-siemens.com, Erwin.Unruh@fujitsu-siemens.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, Andreas.Krakowczyk@fujitsu-siemens.com, Erwin.Unruh@fujitsu-siemens.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, jsm28@cam.ac.uk, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3 X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00358.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 4 15:24:56 2002 State-Changed-Why: The 20010606-1.c test case doesn't seem to be failing on any platform. Does this mean that the optimizer issues referred to have been resolved? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2454