From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-16902-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6421 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 01:26:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6407 invoked by uid 71); 5 Apr 2002 01:26:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 17:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020405012601.6406.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works
 with gcc-2.95.3
Reply-To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00365.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/2454; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <rth@gcc.gnu.org>,  <Andreas.Krakowczyk@fujitsu-siemens.com>, 
     <Erwin.Unruh@fujitsu-siemens.com>,  <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, 
    Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>,  <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works
 with gcc-2.95.3
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 02:25:25 +0100 (BST)

 On 4 Apr 2002 rth@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 
 >     The 20010606-1.c test case doesn't seem to be failing on any
 >     platform.  Does this mean that the optimizer issues referred
 >     to have been resolved?
 
 The testcase is 20011223-1.c from the date it was committed, not
 20010606-1.c.
 
 -- 
 Joseph S. Myers
 jsm28@cam.ac.uk