From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-16914-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14948 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 15:56:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14929 invoked by uid 71); 5 Apr 2002 15:56:01 -0000
Resent-Date: 5 Apr 2002 15:56:01 -0000
Resent-Message-ID: <20020405155601.14928.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Received:(qmail 11828 invoked by uid 61); 5 Apr 2002 15:53:01 -0000
Message-Id:<20020405155301.11827.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 07:56:00 -0000
From: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Reply-To: reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
X-Send-Pr-Version:gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31)
Subject: optimization/6189: Regression from 3.0.x: g++ -O3 generates wrong code
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00377.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>


>Number:         6189
>Category:       optimization
>Synopsis:       Regression from 3.0.x: g++ -O3 generates wrong code
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          wrong-code
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Apr 05 07:56:00 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Volker Reichelt
>Release:        gcc version 3.1 20020325 (prerelease)
>Organization:
>Environment:
i686-pc-linux-gnu, mips-sgi-irix6.5
>Description:
The following small C++-program should return 1,
but compiling the code with "g++ -O3" I get 0 as a result.

----------------------------snip here---------------------
class A
{
  private:
    int x[2];

  public:
    int& GetFirst() { return x[0]; }
};


A foo ()
{ 
    A a;
    a.GetFirst()=1;
    return a;
}


int main()
{
    A b=foo();
    return b.GetFirst();
}
----------------------------snip here---------------------

With less optimization the problem disappears.
It even disappears when I replace "private" by "public".

The bug is a regression from gcc 3.0.x.
>How-To-Repeat:
g++ -O3 bug.cpp; a.out; echo $?
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: