From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27864 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 23:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 27835 invoked by uid 71); 5 Apr 2002 23:16:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 15:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020405231601.27834.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: jason@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jason Merrill Subject: Re: c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Reply-To: Jason Merrill X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00392.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/5504; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason Merrill To: Richard Henderson Cc: Diego Novillo , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/5504: Optimization breaks wei-ku-1 from blitz Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 00:08:11 +0100 >>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill writes: > For 3.1, one option would be to go back to doing destructor cleanups only > on the normal flow path; this would break EH semantics again for this case, > but that would not be a regression and I don't think I've ever seen a bug > report about it in past releases. I take it back; PR c++/411 is for this bug. We may still want to do this, though. Jason