From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16801 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2002 06:15:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16724 invoked by uid 61); 7 Apr 2002 06:15:35 -0000 Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2002 22:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020407061535.16723.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de From: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/5921: ICE with static variable X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: ICE with static variable State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: mmitchel State-Changed-When: Sat Apr 6 22:15:34 2002 State-Changed-Why: Already fixed. The code now gives the same error message it did with GCC 2.95.3. (The crash is still there, but we just emit the "confused, bailing out" error message.) Ideally, we'd eventually fix our error recovery so this never happens, but until then, we've never considered this situation a real bug. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5921