From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17042-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 25398 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2002 20:06:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 25349 invoked by uid 71); 8 Apr 2002 20:06:02 -0000
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 13:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020408200602.25344.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: rth@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/5040: g++-3.0.2: -O causes variables from different stack frames to overlap
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00505.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/5040; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Jeremy Barnes <jeremy.barnes@idilia.com>
Cc: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
   gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/5040: g++-3.0.2: -O causes variables from different stack frames to overlap
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 12:46:36 -0700

 On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 02:24:43PM -0500, Jeremy Barnes wrote:
 > Would it be better to take this up with Mandrake?
 
 Probably.
 
 
 r~