From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17064-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26830 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2002 13:46:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26776 invoked by uid 71); 9 Apr 2002 13:46:27 -0000
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 06:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020409134627.26768.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: optimization/6233: simple loop miscompilation
Reply-To: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00527.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/6233; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/6233: simple loop miscompilation
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 23:09:12 +0930

 On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:57:35PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
 > This patch cures PR6233.
 
 Oh, and as Andreas Jaeger reminded me (thanks!), bootstrapped,
 regression tested i686-linux native.