From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12470 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2002 14:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12453 invoked by uid 71); 9 Apr 2002 14:26:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 07:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020409142600.12452.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jason Merrill Subject: Re: c++/5565: g++ crashes on struct that is defined twice Reply-To: Jason Merrill X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00530.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/5565; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jason Merrill To: Reichelt Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/5565: g++ crashes on struct that is defined twice Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 15:16:37 +0100 >>>>> "Reichelt" == Reichelt writes: > I agree with you, that the PR should be "high priority" any more. > However, I find your explanation quite misleading. IMHO "fixed in 3.1" > would have been more accurate, since it doesn't produce an ICE anymore, > but only "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with recent > snapshots. The "confused" message is just what a release-branch compiler prints if there's an ICE after there have already been valid error messages. Development compilers always give the ICE message. No bug was fixed; only the output has been changed. Jason