From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17099-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19562 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2002 00:46:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19548 invoked by uid 71); 10 Apr 2002 00:46:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 17:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020410004601.19547.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/6233: simple loop miscompilation
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00562.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/6233; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/6233: simple loop miscompilation
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 17:41:07 -0700

 On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 09:30:14AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
 > Sledgehammer to crack a nut?  Should I instead specifically search
 > for the use_mem_scratch?
 
 Please.
 
 
 r~