From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17116-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29445 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2002 11:36:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29426 invoked by uid 71); 10 Apr 2002 11:36:06 -0000
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 04:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020410113606.29424.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: c++/6229: gcc 3.1 namespace lookup seems to fail
Reply-To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00579.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/6229; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: "Peter Klotz" <peter.klotz@aon.at>
Cc: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/6229: gcc 3.1 namespace lookup seems to fail
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:30:50 +0100

 >>>>> "Peter" == Peter Klotz <peter.klotz@aon.at> writes:
 
 > A final question remains: Why is the operator<< that takes a bool considered
 > the best match for my function pointer (why not, for example, the one taking
 > an int)?
 
 Because there is a standard conversion from any pointer to bool, but not to
 int.
 
 Jason