From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6040 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2002 00:16:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6021 invoked by uid 61); 13 Apr 2002 00:16:55 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 17:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020413001655.6020.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/6221: mips-irix6 gcc-3.1 testsuite failure in gcc.c-torture/execute/20020227-1.c X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00683.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: mips-irix6 gcc-3.1 testsuite failure in gcc.c-torture/execute/20020227-1.c State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 12 17:16:55 2002 State-Changed-Why: It's a reload problem common to _all_ 64-bit targets. Why all the separate PRs for failing test cases anyway? http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6221