From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15668 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2002 16:26:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15640 invoked by uid 71); 14 Apr 2002 16:26:00 -0000 Resent-Date: 14 Apr 2002 16:26:00 -0000 Resent-Message-ID: <20020414162600.15639.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, zack@codesourcery.com, neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Received:(qmail 14699 invoked by uid 61); 14 Apr 2002 16:20:32 -0000 Message-Id:<20020414162032.14698.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 09:26:00 -0000 From: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Reply-To: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: zack@codesourcery.com, neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk X-Send-Pr-Version:gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31) X-GNATS-Notify:zack@codesourcery.com neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk Subject: c/6300: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00746.txt.bz2 List-Id: >Number: 6300 >Category: c >Synopsis: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: rejects-legal >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Sun Apr 14 09:26:00 PDT 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Kaveh Ghazi >Release: gcc version 3.1 20020413 (prerelease) >Organization: >Environment: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 native as/ld >Description: Testresult: > FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c (test for excess errors) >>From gcc.log, the excess error is: > Excess errors: > gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c:28: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion It seems that sparcv9- (i.e. not sparc-) is necessary to trigger the bug. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00484.html vs: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00482.html *** This is a regression from 3.0.3. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: