From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13764 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2002 21:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13750 invoked by uid 71); 14 Apr 2002 21:06:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 14:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020414210601.13749.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: target/6221: mips-irix6 gcc-3.1 testsuite failure in gcc.c-torture/execute/20020227-1.c Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00755.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/6221; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Cc: David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/6221: mips-irix6 gcc-3.1 testsuite failure in gcc.c-torture/execute/20020227-1.c Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 13:55:53 -0700 On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 01:28:11PM -0400, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote: > > It's a reload problem common to _all_ 64-bit targets. > > So what is the prognosis doctor? Fixable by 3.1 release? No. We could paper over it by having the rtl generator not generate the problematic case. OTOH, unaligned complex numbers are not exactly a common occurrance, so it's nowhere near a priority. r~