From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24450 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2002 18:16:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24415 invoked by uid 71); 15 Apr 2002 18:16:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020415181605.24411.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Neil Booth Subject: Re: c/6300: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c Reply-To: Neil Booth X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00783.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/6300; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Neil Booth To: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, zack@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: c/6300: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:08:58 +0100 Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:- > > FAIL: gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c (test for excess errors) > > >From gcc.log, the excess error is: > > > Excess errors: > > gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c:28: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion > > It seems that sparcv9- (i.e. not sparc-) is necessary to trigger the bug. See: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00484.html > vs: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00482.html > > *** This is a regression from 3.0.3. Any idea what patch caused it? Neil.