From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21541 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2002 01:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21476 invoked by uid 71); 16 Apr 2002 01:26:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020416012602.21461.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00810.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/6299; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:20:00 -0700 On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 04:03:24PM -0000, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu wrote: > It started as of a 4/12/2002 checkout: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00478.html > > *** This is a regression from 3.0.3 and 2.95.2. Are you sure? It actually "started" by config.guess starting to generate v9 code by default. r~