From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8739 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2002 02:16:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8722 invoked by uid 71); 16 Apr 2002 02:16:03 -0000 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020416021603.8718.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00814.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/6299; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:13:21 -0700 On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:56:20PM -0400, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote: > Perhaps, but I look at it this way: I have a solaris box which happens > to allow sparcv9 insns. The older gcc's installed on that system out > of the box run the testcase fine. The current 3.1 snapshot out of the > box doesn't. Well, until about 2 hours ago, when I reverted the config.guess change -- Rainer convinced me that the name change was a bad idea. The rest of the configury reversion is still being bootstrapped, since I want to keep the header file reorg goodness. r~