From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17371-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 676 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2002 13:26:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 635 invoked by uid 71); 16 Apr 2002 13:26:06 -0000
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 06:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020416132606.631.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Gwenole Beauchesne <gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/6323: GCC 3.1 regression from previous snapshot
Reply-To: Gwenole Beauchesne <gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00834.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/6323; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gwenole Beauchesne <gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com,
        gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, jason@redhat.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/6323: GCC 3.1 regression from previous snapshot
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 15:21:21 +0200

 Hi,
 
 Sirs, sorry for having concatenated your e-mail addresses in the 
 original report. ;-)
 
 FWIW, the error message from GNU C++ version 3.1 20020401 (prerelease) 
 is different from the 2002/04/16 snapshot:
 
 In file included from ../../../libjava/include/jvm.h:110:
 ../../../libjava/exception.cc: At global scope:
 ../../../libjava/exception.cc:28: Internal compiler error in 
 expand_call_inline
    , at tree-inline.c:898
 Please submit a full bug report,
 with preprocessed source if appropriate.
 See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
 
 It works with GNU C++ version 3.1 20020325 (prerelease).
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6323