From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12976 invoked by alias); 16 Apr 2002 17:56:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12939 invoked by uid 71); 16 Apr 2002 17:56:03 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020416175603.12936.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: ro@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Rainer Orth Subject: Re: target/5505: Doubts about a patch for OSF Reply-To: Rainer Orth X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00847.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/5505; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Rainer Orth To: Richard.Kreckel@Uni-Mainz.DE Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/5505: Doubts about a patch for OSF Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 19:54:58 +0200 (MEST) Rainer Orth writes: > > If you have some time, it would be nice if you could confirm the > > dependence on -fno-exceptions before I start stripping that down. Thanks! > > Indeed: the test program works (i.e. doesn't crash) at -O2 and -O1 > -fno-exceptions, but SEGVs at -O2 -fno-exceptions. This seems to be fixed in g++ 3.1 20020327: I've sucessfully built the test with -O2 -fno-exceptions. As an additional test, I've configured CLN 1.1.4 with CXXFLAGS='-O2 -fno-exceptions' --disable-shared --without-gmp and all tests passed. If you can confirm that this really works for you, the PR can be closed. Rainer