From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19367 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2002 01:11:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19309 invoked by uid 61); 17 Apr 2002 01:11:53 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020417011153.19308.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourceryjason@redhat.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourceryjason@redhat.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/6323: GCC 3.1 regression from previous snapshot X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00859.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: GCC 3.1 regression from previous snapshot Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth Responsible-Changed-By: rth Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 16 18:11:52 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: Suspect it's somehow specific to i586 code generation, since i386 and i686 work fine. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6323