From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7635 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2002 01:55:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7601 invoked by uid 61); 17 Apr 2002 01:55:30 -0000 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020417015530.7600.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com, jason@redhat.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com, jason@redhat.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/6323: GCC 3.1 regression from previous snapshot X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00862.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: GCC 3.1 regression from previous snapshot Responsible-Changed-From-To: rth->unassigned Responsible-Changed-By: rth Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 16 18:55:29 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: I was wrong: this is a front end crash. The reason everyone else can build libjava is that they're using -O2 instead of -O1 which doesn't show the problem. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6323