From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7396 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2002 07:06:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7382 invoked by uid 71); 17 Apr 2002 07:06:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 00:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020417070601.7381.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Gwenole Beauchesne Subject: Re: optimization/6323: GCC 3.1 regression from previous snapshot Reply-To: Gwenole Beauchesne X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00870.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/6323; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gwenole Beauchesne To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gbeauchesne@mandrakesoft.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com, jason@redhat.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: optimization/6323: GCC 3.1 regression from previous snapshot Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 09:02:36 +0200 Hi, Actually, I usually build with -O3 + other flags and caught the ICE in libjava, for the first time, in the 2002/04/15 snapshot. Previous one was virtually fine, probably due to the fact that CFLAGS et al. were not propagated down to libjava at this time. Then, I determined "-O1 -finline-functions" was enough to trigger the ICE even on previous snapshots until the 2002/03/25 one or minus Roger's patch. Anyway, he got a patch. Thanks, Gwenole.