From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17458-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27970 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2002 11:06:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27848 invoked by uid 71); 18 Apr 2002 11:06:11 -0000
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 04:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020418110610.27839.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: jason@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: libstdc++/4150: catastrophic performance decrease in C++ code
Reply-To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00921.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/4150; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: bkoz@redhat.com
Cc: libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/4150: catastrophic performance decrease in C++ code
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:00:19 +0100

 >>>>> "Jason" == Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
 
 >>> Tested i686-pc-linux-gnu, no regressions.  Any objections?
 
 >> Mainline and branch have diverged a bit right now. Did you test with
 >> branch or mainline?
 
 > trunk.  I'll test on the branch, too.
 
 No regressions.
 
 Jason