From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17620-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16444 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2002 20:46:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 16411 invoked by uid 71); 21 Apr 2002 20:46:02 -0000
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 13:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020421204602.16410.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: optimization/6398: faulty code when inlining in a var-arged function
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01084.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/6398; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: lucho@haemimont.bg
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/6398: faulty code when inlining in a var-arged function
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 16:41:45 -0400

 This has been fixed in gcc version 3.2 20020421 (experimental).
 Could you test 3.1 prelease?
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski