From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17624-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 3390 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2002 21:45:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 3369 invoked by uid 61); 21 Apr 2002 21:45:03 -0000
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 14:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020421214503.3362.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, lucho@haemimont.bg,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
From: jakub@gcc.gnu.org
Reply-To: jakub@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
  lucho@haemimont.bg, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/6398: faulty code when inlining in a var-arged function
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01087.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

Synopsis: faulty code when inlining in a var-arged function

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: jakub
State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 21 14:45:03 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    Hard to say because the testcase is not preprocessed
    and thus it matters a lot what exact glibc headers it has.
    I couldn't reproduce this with 3.1 20020417 (prerelease),
    nor 3.0.2 20011002, nor 3.0.4 (glibc 2.2.5 installed).
    Can you please provide preprocessed source for the testcase?

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6398