From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25450 invoked by alias); 21 Apr 2002 23:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25432 invoked by uid 71); 21 Apr 2002 23:06:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 16:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020421230601.25431.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Falk=20Schramm?= Subject: Re: c/6397: GCC 3.0 crashes compiling Linux kernel 2.4.18 Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?q?Falk=20Schramm?= X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01091.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/6397; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Falk=20Schramm?= To: jakub@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c/6397: GCC 3.0 crashes compiling Linux kernel 2.4.18 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 00:15:29 +0200 (CEST) That was a fast answer! I used the GCC 3.0 release (20010617). Thanks a lot, Falk --- jakub@gcc.gnu.org schrieb: > Synopsis: GCC 3.0 crashes compiling Linux kernel 2.4.18 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: jakub > State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 21 13:50:36 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > I can reproduce this with 3.0.2 20011002, but cannot > reproduce it with 3.0.4 nor 3.1 20020421 (prerelease). > By GCC 3.0 do you mean really 3.0 release, or some > other snapshot/release from 3.0 branch? If the former, > you should definitely upgrade. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6397 __________________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Sie brauchen mehr Speicher für Ihre E-Mails? - http://premiummail.yahoo.de