From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17640-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19474 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2002 09:06:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19458 invoked by uid 71); 22 Apr 2002 09:06:01 -0000
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 02:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020422090601.19457.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: David Hanney <dh@digitalbrain.com>
Subject: Re: optimization/6330: tiny C++ prog broken under -O1
Reply-To: David Hanney <dh@digitalbrain.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01103.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/6330; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: David Hanney <dh@digitalbrain.com>
To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
	gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/6330: tiny C++ prog broken under -O1
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:02:00 +0100

 Many thanks for your prompt response!
 
 I assumed (wrongly, I know) that because "the cast-output is the same four 
 bytes
 as the cast-input" that it would be at the same address (union-style). My bad.
 
 But, given this behavior-set ..
 
     gcc with plain     C++ works.            (no compiler warning)
     gcc with optimized C++ doesn't work.     (no compiler warning)
     gcc with           C   doesn't compile.
    (under gcc 2.95.4 and gcc 3)
 
 .. would a compiler warning be useful here?
 
 Especially as the pointer may be formed implicitly via a reference
 (as shown in the code quoted below)
 
 cheers,
 
 DH
 
 -------------------------------------------
 #!/bin/sh
 
 # what compiler/OS version is it?
 gcc-3.0 -v
 uname -a
 
 # create a program
 echo '#include <stdio.h>' > x.cpp
 echo '#include <stdlib.h>' >> x.cpp
 echo 'typedef unsigned char byte;' >> x.cpp;
 echo 'typedef byte *pbyte;' >> x.cpp;
 echo 'void change(pbyte &z) { z = (pbyte)"correct"; }' >> x.cpp
 echo 'int main() {' >> x.cpp
 echo '    char *s = "incorrect";' >> x.cpp
 echo '    change((byte*)s);' >> x.cpp
 echo '    printf("%s\n", s);' >> x.cpp
 echo '    exit(0);' >> x.cpp
 echo '}' >> x.cpp
 
 # compile and run it
 gcc-3.0 x.cpp
 ./a.out
 
 # compile and run The Same Program optimized
 gcc-3.0 -O1 x.cpp
 ./a.out
 -------------------------------------------
 
 
 
 
 
 At 00:41 18/04/02 +0000, rth@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 >Synopsis: tiny C++ prog broken under -O1
 >
 >State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 >State-Changed-By: rth
 >State-Changed-When: Wed Apr 17 17:41:35 2002
 >State-Changed-Why:
 >     Not a bug.  You have taken the address of a temporary.
 >     You wanted "change((byte**)&s)".
 >
 >http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6330 
 >