From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18200 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2002 15:46:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18151 invoked by uid 71); 22 Apr 2002 15:46:04 -0000 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 08:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020422154604.18147.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: davem@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Jeff Sturm Subject: Re: target/6383: boehm-gc busted on all sparc64 targets Reply-To: Jeff Sturm X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01111.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR target/6383; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jeff Sturm To: "David S. Miller" Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, rth@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: target/6383: boehm-gc busted on all sparc64 targets Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 11:40:35 -0400 (EDT) On Sun, 21 Apr 2002, David S. Miller wrote: > Thanks for tracking this down and testing your fix Jeff. I suspected > that lack of DYNAMIC_LOADING for solaris sparc64 was bogus and I > had noted it to tromey the other evening. I checked that the solaris breakage is from the last gc import. I'm not too keen about blindly importing each new release for this sort of reason. I don't have a better suggestion though, except making gcc the official repository for boehm-gc, as had been discussed at one time. ISTR there was another (java?) PR related to this one. I haven't tried a full testsuite, but at least simple Java programs are now running for me on sparc64. Thanks for taking care of this. Jeff