From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22777 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2002 19:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22742 invoked by uid 71); 22 Apr 2002 19:46:00 -0000 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020422194600.22741.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Subject: Re: c/6300: [PATCH] sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c Reply-To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01124.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/6300; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" To: zack@codesourcery.com Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk Subject: Re: c/6300: [PATCH] sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in gcc.dg/cpp/charconst.c Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 15:43:30 -0400 (EDT) > From: Zack Weinberg > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 06:24:15PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote: > > > The cure is to call convert() to the proper type from lex_charconst, > > instead of just smashing the type field. I am bootstrapping the > > appended change now. If you could test it on solaris, I'd appreciate > > it. > > Here's testsuite results for i686-linux (3.1 branch). I believe > they indicate no new regressions for this change. > zw Bootstrap with your patch and a testsuite run completed on solaris2.7, no regressions and the charconst.c test now passes. Thanks Zack! --Kaveh -- Kaveh R. Ghazi Director of Systems Architecture ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Global Services