From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17788-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 26200 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 16:06:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26171 invoked by uid 71); 24 Apr 2002 16:06:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:06:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020424160601.26170.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: jason@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: c++/6331: g++ 3.1 looses const qualifiers
Reply-To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01251.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/6331; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
To: "jason@gcc.gnu.org" <jason@gcc.gnu.org>, "aj@suse.de" <aj@suse.de>,
   "gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org" <mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org>,
   "pmladek@suse.cz" <pmladek@suse.cz>, "pthomas@suse.de" <pthomas@suse.de>,
   "schwab@suse.de" <schwab@suse.de>,
   "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/6331: g++ 3.1 looses const qualifiers
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 08:55:26 -0700

 --On Wednesday, April 24, 2002 09:05:06 AM +0000 "jason@gcc.gnu.org" 
 <jason@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
 
 > Synopsis: g++ 3.1 looses const qualifiers
 >
 > Responsible-Changed-From-To: mmitchel->jason
 > Responsible-Changed-By: jason
 > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 24 02:05:05 2002
 > Responsible-Changed-Why:
 >     got the second bug
 >
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gc
 > c&pr=6331
 
 Shucks, we were duplicating work; I was working on that too.
 
 When I tried the change you made to build_modify_expr, I got a failure in
 this g++.benjamin/14664-1.c, which tests that we cannot assign a string
 literal to an array of characters (because the array of characters is
 const).  This is probably a goofy test; what shoudl be interesting is
 whether we can assign the element types and it looks like the logic
 for creating this test was that EDG issues an error -- but about array
 assignment in general.
 
 Anyhow, did you change the test, or did it still pass for you?
 
 --
 Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
 CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com