From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6670 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 17:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6630 invoked by uid 71); 24 Apr 2002 17:26:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020424172601.6628.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: jason@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mark Mitchell Subject: Re: c++/6331: g++ 3.1 looses const qualifiers Reply-To: Mark Mitchell X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01260.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/6331; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Mitchell To: Jason Merrill Cc: "gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" , "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: c++/6331: g++ 3.1 looses const qualifiers Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 10:21:16 -0700 > The original bug report that the testcase is derived from complained about > the error; the customer said that either the extension should be dropped > or the testcase should be accepted. Neither of those came to pass. > > I wouldn't object to making the pedwarn unconditional. I agree; let's just kill this extension -- it is totally undocumented, and provides no real power since memcpy/loops do the same thing. Do you have time to make that change, or do you want me to do it? Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com