From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16653 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 20:36:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16601 invoked by uid 71); 24 Apr 2002 20:36:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020424203603.16600.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: davem@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Subject: Re: libgcj/6092: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 has hundreds oflibjava failures with -m64 Reply-To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01275.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libgcj/6092; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" To: davem@redhat.com Cc: davem@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu, ghazi@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libgcj/6092: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 has hundreds oflibjava failures with -m64 Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 16:30:53 -0400 (EDT) > From: "David S. Miller" > > From: Tom Tromey > Date: 24 Apr 2002 13:58:23 -0600 > > Kaveh> See -m64 java results here: > Kaveh> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00875.html > > I can't argue with those results. > I do wonder why my Solaris 2.7 build still fails. > Do the GC tests work for you? > (`make check' in the boehm-gc target build directory) > > With that small number of failures, boehm-gc is working. > If it isn't working you get at least 140 failures. Note there are 8 or 9 failures remaining depending on what RUNTESTFLAGS you use during the checks. Shall I file individual reports for them or are they already being handled? Thanks, --Kaveh -- Kaveh R. Ghazi Director of Systems Architecture ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Global Services