Re: libgcj/6092: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 has hundreds of libjava failures with -m64

["Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>]

The following reply was made to PR libgcj/6092; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
To: tromey@redhat.com
Cc: davem@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
        gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, ghazi@gcc.gnu.org, java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libgcj/6092: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 has hundreds of libjava failures with -m64
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 19:12:57 -0400 (EDT)

  > From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
  > 
  > >>>>> "Kaveh" == Kaveh R Ghazi <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> writes:
  > 
  > Kaveh> I'm not sure what problem you are seeing or why.  Can you
  > Kaveh> provide more detail?  Perhaps it makes sense to open a separate
  > Kaveh> PR.
  > 
  > I am seeing the same behavior I saw before the patch went in.
  > The GC crashes in the same way.
  > At this point I'm assuming there is just something wrong with my build.
  > I'm not very concerned about it, and anyway I don't have the time to
  > look into it.
  > Tom
 
 Tom - Here's an independent example that leads me to believe its truly
 fixed.  A 4/18 build on a sparcv9 target had 257 failures, whereas a
 4/22 build had only 4 failures.  See:
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00685.html
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00820.html
 
 So I also suspect there's something wrong in your personal build.
 But it could also be something subtly different about your box
 like the kernel version, etc.  I can't say for sure.
 
 		--Kaveh
 --
 Kaveh R. Ghazi			Director of Systems Architecture
 ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Global Services