From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21411 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 16:35:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21387 invoked by uid 61); 25 Apr 2002 16:35:09 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020425163508.21385.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, tmwg@inxservices.com From: jakub@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: jakub@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, tmwg@inxservices.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/6396: 3.1 flow.c 583 ICE with -frename-registers X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01353.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: 3.1 flow.c 583 ICE with -frename-registers State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: jakub State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 25 09:35:06 2002 State-Changed-Why: Using -frename-registers at -O0 is a bad idea. I've just submitted a patch which does register renaming only when optimizing. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6396