From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30089 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 17:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30063 invoked by uid 71); 25 Apr 2002 17:36:02 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020425173602.30062.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: George Garvey Subject: Re: c++/6396: 3.1 flow.c 583 ICE with -frename-registers Reply-To: George Garvey X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01357.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/6396; it has been noted by GNATS. From: George Garvey To: jakub@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Cc: Subject: Re: c++/6396: 3.1 flow.c 583 ICE with -frename-registers Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 10:26:15 -0700 You are right. I messed something up in the makefile, and added -O0 by mistake after -O2 et al. I just verified that removing the -O0 and only using -O2 and the other options does not get an ICE, the file compiles successfully. On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 04:35:08PM -0000, jakub@gcc.gnu.org wrote: > Synopsis: 3.1 flow.c 583 ICE with -frename-registers > > State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed > State-Changed-By: jakub > State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 25 09:35:06 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > Using -frename-registers at -O0 is a bad idea. > I've just submitted a patch which does register renaming > only when optimizing. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6396