From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17911-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27535 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 21:26:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27507 invoked by uid 71); 25 Apr 2002 21:26:01 -0000
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020425212601.27505.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: tm <tm@mail.kloo.net>
Subject: Re: pending/6240: Re: reload1.c failure for sh-elf.  Bootstrap
 failure on
Reply-To: tm <tm@mail.kloo.net>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01374.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR pending/6240; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: tm <tm@mail.kloo.net>
To: Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: pending/6240: Re: reload1.c failure for sh-elf.  Bootstrap
 failure on
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:13:15 -0700 (PDT)

 On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Neil Booth wrote:
 
 > tm wrote:-
 > 
 > > Sorry, this issue still exists. Please reopen.
 > > 
 > > Toshi
 > 
 > I didn't close a PR; it was just a reply to e-mail that GNATS bogusly
 > interpreted as a PR.  There were no details of any bug.
 > 
 > Either the actual PR is under another number, or you've never
 > submitted a valid PR.
 
 NIIBE Yutaka has reported the same problem.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-04/msg01068.html
 
 Please append this URL to the PR.
 
 Toshi