From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11164 invoked by alias); 25 Apr 2002 22:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11150 invoked by uid 71); 25 Apr 2002 22:06:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020425220600.11149.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Mark Mitchell Subject: Re: c++/5607: No pointer adjustment in covariant return types (PATCH) Reply-To: Mark Mitchell X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01375.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/5607; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Mitchell To: Jason Merrill , "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" Cc: "gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" Subject: Re: c++/5607: No pointer adjustment in covariant return types (PATCH) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:56:55 -0700 > Tested i686-pc-linux-gnu, applied to trunk. Mark, do you think this > should go into 3.1? It's not a regression, but I don't like silently > generating bad code... Me neither, but it's not the only place. Let's hold off. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com