From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-17991-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4134 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2002 11:56:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4069 invoked by uid 71); 26 Apr 2002 11:56:03 -0000
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 04:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020426115603.4066.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: c++/3239: template specializations and namespace issues
Reply-To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01454.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/3239; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: bkoz@gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, mark@codesourcery.com,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/3239: template specializations and namespace issues
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 12:55:55 +0100

 To clarify, if the specialization had been previously declared in std, the
 definition would be well-formed (and accepted by g++).
 
 Jason