From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25895 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2002 16:19:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25870 invoked by uid 61); 26 Apr 2002 16:19:07 -0000 Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020426161907.25869.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, sven.meyer@hacon.de From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, sven.meyer@hacon.de, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c++/5719: Suspect gcc-3 to report wrong waring for 'T& T::operator+=( const T& )' X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01475.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Suspect gcc-3 to report wrong waring for 'T& T::operator+=( const T& )' State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: nathan State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 26 09:19:06 2002 State-Changed-Why: yup, regression from 2.95. the code in decl.c seems to be checking for plain operator+ but gets these ones too. And seems to miss operator% http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5719