From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15708 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2002 07:36:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15671 invoked by uid 61); 27 Apr 2002 07:36:11 -0000 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 00:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020427073611.15670.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: fpf@localhost.localdomain, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org From: rth@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: rth@gcc.gnu.org, fpf@localhost.localdomain, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: middle-end/5154: GCC 3.0.2 crashes when compiling a HUGE function X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01514.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: GCC 3.0.2 crashes when compiling a HUGE function Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth Responsible-Changed-By: rth Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 27 00:36:11 2002 Responsible-Changed-Why: . State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed State-Changed-By: rth State-Changed-When: Sat Apr 27 00:36:11 2002 State-Changed-Why: GC is crashing because the mark routines filled the stack. This is a regression from 2.95, which compiles the test case provided you can give it enough ram. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5154