From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14910 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2002 16:15:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14878 invoked by uid 61); 29 Apr 2002 16:15:11 -0000 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020429161511.14877.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, spigel@olvs.miee.ru From: jakub@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: jakub@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, spigel@olvs.miee.ru, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: optimization/6505: rename registers X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01600.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: rename registers State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: jakub State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 29 09:15:10 2002 State-Changed-Why: You should include the exact g++ options passed to mcopidl.cc and preprocessed source for it (mcopidl.ii, see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for details). Just wondering whether arts isn't passing -O0 to it, then it might be dup of c++/6396. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6505