From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1973 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2002 17:36:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1949 invoked by uid 71); 30 Apr 2002 17:36:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 10:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020430173602.1946.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: danglin@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "John David Anglin" Subject: Re: ada/6483: ada fails to build under hppa*-hp-hpux* Reply-To: "John David Anglin" X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01638.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR ada/6483; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "John David Anglin" To: mark@codesourcery.com (Mark Mitchell) Cc: fw@deneb.enyo.de, dave.anglin@nrc.ca, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, zack@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: ada/6483: ada fails to build under hppa*-hp-hpux* Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 13:32:15 -0400 (EDT) > > Then, I don't understand the FSF point of view on what's a regression. > > It's not a regression because we never had a release where this worked. OK, I see. ADA wasn't integrated into the GCC tree before. However, the makefile infrastructure existed which enabled you to build ada if it was inserted into the tree. Possibly the other high priority ada PRs should not be marked as high priority. In looking at , there is no mention that ADA is new. Dave -- J. David Anglin dave.anglin@nrc.ca National Research Council of Canada (613) 990-0752 (FAX: 952-6605)