From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13269 invoked by alias); 1 May 2002 04:56:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13237 invoked by uid 71); 1 May 2002 04:56:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 21:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020501045600.13236.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: kenner@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" Subject: Re: c++/6212: g++ testsuite EH regressions for irix6 -mabi=64 Reply-To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01677.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c++/6212; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" To: David.Billinghurst@riotinto.com, rth@redhat.com Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu Subject: Re: c++/6212: g++ testsuite EH regressions for irix6 -mabi=64 Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 00:50:47 -0400 (EDT) > From: Richard Henderson > > On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 01:31:07PM +1000, Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote: > > The tests now pass on 3.1 and 3.2. I am unsure if the PR should be closed, > > or if the problem that rth mentions is still present. > > It is. > r~ Does it make sense to put the testcase you wrote in the URL below into the testsuite? That way we won't lose the fact that it still needs to be fixed. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-04/msg01220.html --Kaveh -- Kaveh R. Ghazi Director of Systems Architecture ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Global Services