public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cgd@broadcom.com To: echristo@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, Subject: Re: libstdc++/5625: exception unwinding creates invalid pointer o n mips Date: Wed, 01 May 2002 10:36:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20020501173601.14999.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw) The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/5625; it has been noted by GNATS. From: cgd@broadcom.com To: echristo@redhat.com, "'gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, "'gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>, "'gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org'" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org> Cc: Subject: Re: libstdc++/5625: exception unwinding creates invalid pointer o n mips Date: 01 May 2002 10:29:36 -0700 FYI, I just checked in a change to the mips64 gdb simulator code so that it will do checking of values (for many, but certainly not all 8-) which are allowed to produce UNPREDICTABLE results. This causes 27 gcc (g++, actually) tests which previously passed to fail, due to UNPREDICTABLE behaviour: FAIL: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C execution test FAIL: g++.dg/eh/unexpected1.C execution test FAIL: g++.brendan/eh1.C Execution test FAIL: g++.eh/flow1.C Execution test FAIL: g++.eh/fntry1.C Execution test FAIL: g++.eh/ia64-1.C Execution test FAIL: g++.eh/inline2.C Execution test FAIL: g++.eh/pdel2.C Execution test FAIL: g++.eh/spec2.C Execution test FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test FAIL: g++.eh/spec4.C Execution test FAIL: g++.eh/tmpl1.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh16.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh17.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh39.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh40.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh49.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh50.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh51.C Execution test FAIL: g++.mike/eh6.C Execution test FAIL: g++.other/eh3.C Execution test FAIL: g++.other/singleton.C Execution test FAIL: g++.other/vbase2.C Execution test FAIL: g++.pt/fntry1.C Execution test FAIL: g++.robertl/eb66.C Execution test FAIL: g++.robertl/eb88.C Execution test chris
next reply other threads:[~2002-05-01 17:36 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2002-05-01 10:36 cgd [this message] -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2002-04-24 12:46 Ed Maste 2002-04-23 16:16 cgd 2002-04-23 13:56 cgd 2002-04-23 12:56 Eric Christopher 2002-04-23 12:36 Ed Maste
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20020501173601.14999.qmail@sources.redhat.com \ --to=cgd@broadcom.com \ --cc=echristo@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).