From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18133 invoked by alias); 2 May 2002 10:56:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18119 invoked by uid 71); 2 May 2002 10:56:03 -0000 Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 03:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020502105603.18118.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Olaf Dietsche Subject: Re: libstdc++/6532: STL binder1st::operator() not compiling Reply-To: Olaf Dietsche X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00036.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/6532; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Olaf Dietsche To: paolo@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: libstdc++/6532: STL binder1st::operator() not compiling Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:54:50 +0200 Hi Paolo, thanks for your fast response. paolo@gcc.gnu.org writes: > Synopsis: STL binder1st::operator() not compiling > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->paolo > Responsible-Changed-By: paolo > Responsible-Changed-When: Wed May 1 10:00:42 2002 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Triaged. > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: paolo > State-Changed-When: Wed May 1 10:00:42 2002 > State-Changed-Why: > Duplicate of libstd++/5012: not a bug, but instead standard conforming behaviour. I've taken a look at this bug report. So, the library is implemented conforming to the C++ Standard, but unfortunately the issue remains. How am I supposed to use this binder/mem_fun combination for modifying methods? Changing the signature to call by value is not an option here, since the semantics would be changed too. This seems like a bug or at least an oversight in the standard. What am I missing? Thanks for your time. Regards, Olaf.