From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2212 invoked by alias); 3 May 2002 20:06:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2198 invoked by uid 71); 3 May 2002 20:06:01 -0000 Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 13:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020503200601.2197.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: rspier@pobox.com (Robert Spier) Subject: Re: preprocessor/6521: -MG creates dependency with wrong path Reply-To: rspier@pobox.com (Robert Spier) X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00083.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR preprocessor/6521; it has been noted by GNATS. From: rspier@pobox.com (Robert Spier) To: Zack Weinberg Cc: Neil Booth , gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: preprocessor/6521: -MG creates dependency with wrong path Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 12:55:56 -0700 >> This is intended behaviour (but undocumented I think); whether it is >> desirable or not is a different question. >> >> IMO this is not worth fixing; and we should just document the behaviour >> for <> headers. What do you think, Zack? > >Agreed. Why is this the intended behavior? It doesn't make much sense to me. Thanks- -R