From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-18424-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18223 invoked by alias); 7 May 2002 22:46:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18208 invoked by uid 71); 7 May 2002 22:46:02 -0000
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 15:46:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20020507224602.18205.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: c++/6508: compilation error when using "min< double >" as function parameter
Reply-To: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/6508; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, yap_noel@olf.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
        nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/6508: compilation error when using "min< double >" as function parameter
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 01:11:03 +0200

 Hi,
 
 the bug can be reproduced with the following code snippet:
 
 --------------------------snip here---------------------
 template<typename T> void foo(T) { }
 void foo() { }
 
 template < typename Fn >
 void bar(Fn f)
 {
     f();
 }
 
 void quux()
 {
     bar(foo);
 }
 --------------------------snip here---------------------
 
 The bug is still present in gcc 3.1 20020506 (prerelease).
 
 Greetings,
 Volker Reichelt
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6508