From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32208 invoked by alias); 8 May 2002 06:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32100 invoked by uid 71); 8 May 2002 06:06:07 -0000 Resent-Date: 8 May 2002 06:06:06 -0000 Resent-Message-ID: <20020508060606.32098.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Resent-From: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Resent-Reply-To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, thorpej@wasabisystems.com Received:(qmail 29747 invoked by uid 61); 8 May 2002 06:00:25 -0000 Message-Id:<20020508060025.29742.qmail@sources.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 23:06:00 -0000 From: thorpej@wasabisystems.com Reply-To: thorpej@wasabisystems.com To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org X-Send-Pr-Version:gnatsweb-2.9.3 (1.1.1.1.2.31) Subject: target/6603: sh-elf fails to build libgcc X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 List-Id: >Number: 6603 >Category: target >Synopsis: sh-elf fails to build libgcc >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: unassigned >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: net >Arrival-Date: Tue May 07 23:06:01 PDT 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Jason R Thorpe >Release: gcc version 3.2 20020507 (experimental) >Organization: >Environment: i386-netbsdelf host and sh-elf target >Description: Building a sh-elf compiler fails while building __muldi3 for libgcc: ../../../gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c: In function `__muldi3': ../../../gcc/gcc/libgcc2.c:367: RTL flag check: access macro used with unexpected rtx code `jump_insn' in dbr_schedule, at reorg.c:3631 A similar failure occurs while building the same function for with the sh-netbsdelf configuration I posted some time ago (problems in updating this configuration prompted this report). >How-To-Repeat: Attempt to build a sh-elf compiler. >Fix: The function can be compiled with -O0. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: