From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30335 invoked by alias); 8 May 2002 17:38:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30307 invoked by uid 61); 8 May 2002 17:38:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 10:38:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20020508173831.30306.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, wheisler@inflow.com From: neil@gcc.gnu.org Reply-To: neil@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, wheisler@inflow.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/6607: Inconsisitency using right shift operator (signed vs. unsigned shift) X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00236.txt.bz2 List-Id: Synopsis: Inconsisitency using right shift operator (signed vs. unsigned shift) State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: neil State-Changed-When: Wed May 8 10:38:30 2002 State-Changed-Why: Can you reproduce this behaviour for a shift of less than 32 bits? A shift of the same number of bits as the width of the type gives undefined behaviour, so the testcase you post is not a bug as-is. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6607